Religious "Freedom" in Virginia

It's Good Friday and thoughts turn to the resurrection. But that begs some questions about Virginia, religion, bias and other oddities, not to mention myths.

A couple of months ago, I was driving and listened to a "Fresh Air" segment that actually ran on NPR a year before. The guest was Steven Waldman who had written a provocative book called "Founding Faith: Providence, Politics, and the Birth of Religious Freedom in America."

It was a fascinating interview for me since I have long heard all the old saws here in Virginia about how our beloved state was a torch of religious freedom, that it was the bedrock of a "Christian" America and about how all over our founding fathers, such as the beloved Thomas Jefferson, rang the bell of Christian freedom.

Bunk, says Waldman (I went back and listened to his interview).

For one thing, Virginia was anything but a hotbed of religious freedom. As in most of the pre-revolutionary states, freedom involved "toleration of various Protestant sects and did not involve Jews or Catholics or atheists," says Waldman.

Indeed, Catholics (I was raised one, by the way) were regarded as unwholesome and dangerous "papists" and their church was a "whore" for taking money offerings. Our freedom-loving colonist forefathers prohibited Catholics from holding office in 1640 unless they took an oath of allegiance to the Church of England. "Popish" priests were to be deported. Jews likewise didn't exactly receive a welcome mat by the so-called freedom-loving "Christians." They were kept out of Virginia for at least a couple of generations in the 1600s. Also not welcome: Quakers and Puritans.

Christian conservatives love to characterize Virginia and the U.S. as a "Christian" nation. Not exactly, says Waldman. With the revolution came the idea, albeit a somewhat limited one, of religious tolerance. George Washington, for instance, encouraged the rapid anti-Catholicism among his troops to end. Why? He realized they needed help from mostly-Catholic French Canadians against the British.

Or, take Thomas Jefferson, the demigod that everyone in the Old Dominion reveres and some have named their neo-con think tanks after, even if they have no idea of what TJ was really thinking. Although deeply religious, TJ was not exactly your faith-healing, Jesus-praising evangelical that you might see on TV all bundled up in the American flag while clutching a crucifix.

TJ had a lot of trouble with the Bible. He thought Jesus Christ was a brilliant social philosopher but he didn't buy miracles, divinity and a lot of other stuff. Nor did he especially like Christmas or Easter.

In fact, in later life, TJ got out a pair of scissors and started cutting up the Bible to eliminate the parts he didn't buy. Gone were a lot of miracles. Christmas? Gone. And so was Easter. He ended his TJ Bible edition with the rock moved against the tomb on Good Friday. "It never moved again," says Waldman."

The end. As Waldman says, "This guy would never be elected today." Happy Easter!

Peter Galuszka

The Economy: Weapon of the Future

Consider this, a "Wait, wait, there's more" posting. Jim Bacon just noted the interest of the Chinese and Russians in using the Internet to disrupt American infrastructure such as electrical grids and the like.

Well, Politico reports that the Pentagon has been getting into the act in its own way. Last month, it staged a two-day exercise about how to respond to the threat of foreign nations using whatever economic means available to screw over the U.S.

The two day event near super secret Fort Meade in Maryland worked in a Dr. Strangelove-style "War Room." Hedge fund managers and economics professors replaced bomber jockeys and nuke theory gurus as the players. Their game: blunt attempts by China, Russia or anyone else to toast the U.S. economy through any variety of plays, such as currency manipulation or shorting stocks.

According to Politico, various scenarios acted out included the collapse of North Korea, the Kremlin playing around with natural gas prices, flare ups between Taiwan and China and other crisis. Players assumed roles of Russia, China and the U.S. China won, since the U.S. and Russia spent so much time one-upping the other that they were diverted.

When you think about it, economics is really the prime reason for many wars. It was behind the American Revolution (not the gleaming thoughts of Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson and other rhetoric stars). Ditto Japan's economic ambitions in Asia. Hitler, of course, was bent on ideology.

War games can be fun. When I was in college majoring in international relations, my dorm was near the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, a big deal foreign affairs graduate school. It was controversial because these were the Vietnam years and Fletcher hosted lots of CIA, Foreign Service and military types. I found some of them interesting because they had actually had experience in the field, unlike many of my professors who were more bent on protest alone.

Anyway, I got to know an Air Force colonel who was doing a mid-career teaching stint at Fletcher and he invited me to participate in a game he was doing with students. It lasted two days without sleep and it was fascinating (although I can't remember exact details).

The point of the Ft. Meade exercise seems to be that the weapons of the future won't be Stealth destroyers or F-22 Raptors but Sovereign Wealth Funds, Credit Default Swaps and hot money currency plays.

Might be interesting to know where Virginia, the nation's No. 2 defense industrial state, fits in with this.

Peter Galuszka

If You Liked Oil as a Strategic Weapon, You'll Love This

There are sound economic and environmental reasons to build a distributed grid system for producing and distributing electricity, as we have explored on this blog. Here's another reason: cybersecurity. As reported today in the Wall Street Journal, Cyberspies traced to Russia and China have penetrated the U.S. electrical grid and left behind programs that "could be used to disrupt the system."

You like being hostage to Middle Eastern oil sheikhs? Let's put it this way, if the oil sheikhs have a hand metaphorically clamped firmly around our privates, anyone with the power to take out our electrical grid has our privates encased in one of those Medieval "lemon squeezer" torture devices and a hand on the tourniquet. Writes the Journal:

The espionage appeared pervasive across the U.S. ... Many of the intrusions were detected no by the companies in charge of the infrastructure but by U.S. intelligence agencies, officials said. Intelligence officials worry about cyber attackers taking control of electrical facilites, a nuclear power plan or financial networks via the Internet.

Authorities investigating the intrusions have found software tools left behind that could be used to destroy infrastructure components, [a] senior intelligence official said.

I'm not terribly worried about going to war with Russia or China anytime soon, but you never know how geopolitical alignments might look a decade from now. Moreover, if Russian and Chinese intelligence can penetrate our electrical infrastructure, who's to say that terrorists couldn't as well?

Primary responsibility for overseeing the electrical grid here in Virginia is the State Corporation Commission. The SCC needs to begin studying this problem immediately and (1) determine to what extent it is a real threat (as opposed to a threat conjured up by some high-level bureaucrat looking to scare up more funding for his program), (2) how vulnerable Virginia is to disruption, and (3) what strategies we can pursue to offset the risk. A central question: Would a decentralized, distributed grid employing more locally generated power sources (including household-level wind and solar) be less vulnerable?